9 changes · 2026-09-30 onward
What this index has got wrong.
Every change to the 112 entries, in order, generated from the commit log rather than kept by hand. An index that says it wants to be corrected and then shows no corrections has told you nothing.
- classificationthe index
Update .gitignore, package dependencies, and CI configuration; enhance accessibility and sitemap
Commit 78f8be9
- classificationthe index
Add rendering scripts for icons and SEO audit; update package.json and README
Commit 3626745
- classificationthe index
Cut the index by engineering role, and give every route a share card
Commit 977ce50
- the index
Add cross-layer comparisons and a public verification report
Commit f9765d4
- classificationthe index
Classify every tool with structured attributes and an alternatives graph
Commit 9381e64
- the index
Add per-tool pages, a filterable all-tools view, a decision path, and RSS
Commit 2b516cb
- the index
checkpoint: uncommitted essays, diagrams, OG images, comparisons
Commit 66b7533
- the index
Add MDX essay section, architecture diagrams, cover images, and SEO
Commit 1d7c350
- the index
Lattice: initial commit — AI tooling directory
Commit 81f85fe
How to read this
- This is a record, not a score. A short log means little has needed fixing, or that this page was added late — it is not evidence that the index is right. The method says where the index is wrong in ways a commit cannot show.
- Commit subjects are verbatim. Nothing here is reworded for the reader, because a paraphrased log is a second claim about what happened and this page’s only value is that it is not one.
- The enforcement is elsewhere. Licence and cost data older than six months fails the build, so a deployed copy of /verification.json is a receipt for a check that actually ran. A changelog can be edited; a build that throws cannot.
- Found something wrong? Open an issue. Corrections are treated as more urgent than new entries, and a wrong licence changes architecture for everyone who reads this page.